Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Harlan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1982No. Civ. No. 48351Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinio’1.ara Holmes and defendant Speckman ,c to a certain parcel of real property in *

r& & ./-foot strip of real property lying between plaintiffs ’ <y. Plaintiffs purchased an approximately three acre This fcP, and deft parcel of k v defendant Speckman in 1976. In conversations prior to the sale, Mrs. Sp man told plaintiffs that a certain fence constituted the property line and that, in her opinion, a bam was part of the property. Plaintiffs used the bam and road, planted a garden and installed a septic tank and trailer on the disputed strip.

Mrs. Speckman testified that she purchased the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gilardi v. HallamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. County of Los Angeles v. BerkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Dibirt v. BoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Brown v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API