Legal Opinion

Michiels v. Succession of Gladden

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1938No. 34883PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The question in this case is whether the statute (Act No. 189 of 1914 as amended) which exempts the proceeds or avails of all life insurance from liability for the debts of the insured forbids an insured, who has no forced heir, and whose life insurance is payable to his executors or administrators, or his estate, to stipulate in his will that his executors shall apply the proceeds of his life insurance to the payment of his debts before paying any of the legacies provided for in the will.

The testator, in his will, directed that 40 acres of land which he owned should be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Davidson Realty Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Succession of DumestreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
  4. Union Trust Co. v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Succession of CottonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CHF Finance Company v. JochumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  2. Muse v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Succession of OnoratoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Stein v. Town of LafitteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Succession of SweeneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API