Legal Opinion

Walliser v. Mineta

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 19, 2002No. 01-2811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This lawsuit, like each of Plaintiff-Appellant John P. Walliser’s five prior lawsuits, concerns the condemnation of Wallis-er’s home by the Illinois Department of Transportation (“IDOT”), in conjunction with the United States Department of Transportation (“USDOT”), in order to extend Interstate 355 through the far south suburbs of Chicago. The district court dismissed the case, and Walliser appeals. We affirm.

Because Walliser’s property in Homer Township, 111., was in the path of the proposed tollway, IDOT purchased Walliser’s home and evicted him. Walliser subsequently filed this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walliser v. HannigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Cary v. City of WatsekaDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. John Walliser v. Milton SeesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Walliser v. HannigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API