Legal Opinion

Cross v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. A. M. Woodson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEddison, J.

This action is based on an account for legal services rendered by plaintiff for defendant. The plaintiff recovered below.

„■ . Statement. The evidence on plaintiff’s part- tended to show an employment at the stated rate of $600 per year. The evidence in behalf of defendant tended ■ , to show an employment for no fixed sum but depending for the amount of compensation on the value of the services rendered by plaintiff. The employment was made by Mr. Lathrop as the defendant’s solicitor for Missouri, and the tendency of defendant’s evidence was that Mr. Lathrop had no authority, as defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. MaplesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Rice v. GroffmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Boogher v. Maryland Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Samuel v. BarteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farm and Home Savings and Loan Assn. v. StubbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Overstreet v. MoserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Reynolds v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Miller v. Yellowstone Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Wilson v. Supreme Liberty Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API