Rice v. Groffmann
Supreme Court of Missouri
•Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. T. The instruction given on the part of respondent is erroneoits; (a.) in leaving out of view the question, whether the plaintiffs were, or were not,estopped from denying the right of Berlzheimer to collect the money, by permitting the defendant to rest under the impression that be could safely pay Berlzheimer.
Read the full summary
•Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. T. The instruction given on the part of respondent is erroneoits; (a.) in leaving out of view the question, whether the plaintiffs were, or were not,estopped from denying the right of Berlzheimer to collect the money, by permitting the defendant to rest under the impression that be could safely pay Berlzheimer. This works an estoppel upon plaintiffs, and they cannot now allege that Berlzheimer had no right to receive said money as against defendant.- Silence, when a person should speak, estops. (Skinner vs. Stouse, 4 Mo., 93: Eice vs. Bunce, 49 Mo., 231;…
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge
This was a suit originating in a justice’s court to recover $27.50 for 500 cigars sold to defendant. It seems that the defendant bought the cigars from one Berlzheimer, who came into his saloon, and upon his assuring the defendant that he had some good cigars, such as the defendant'had bought from him before, defendant finally agreed to take five hundred at forty-five dollars a thousand, if they proved to be like those he had formerly bought, and he (Berlzheimer) wonld wait upon defendant thirty days. The next day Berlzheimer brought the cigars and delivered them to defendant, and a bill of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brooks v. JamesonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Sumner v. SaundersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Lumley v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scott v. AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Johnson v. HurleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Hammerslough v. CheathamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Butler v. DormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Bailey v. PardridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.