Legal Opinion
Weicker v. Bromfield
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 7, 1929No. Nos. 29-34, 36, 37PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
These eight appeals involve the same controversy. The eases were consolidated for trial and on thtó appeal. All are actions at law, tried to the court without a jury, and findings of fact made. The notes involved here are a part of a bunch of notes which were among the assets of the Globe National Bank at the time of its failure on September 19,1925. The receiver sued on the notes in six of the cases. In two of the eases the Globe National Bank had negotiated the notes to purchasers for value before maturity and the makers paid the notes. In one of such cases, No. 37,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Curtis v. ConnlySupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- National Surety Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knox v. First Security Bank of UtahCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- American Nat. Bank of Sapulpa v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Bromfield v. Trinidad Nat. Inv. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- State-Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. First Nat. Bank of VictoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Lennox Metal Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.