Legal Opinion
Scott v. Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Chicago Motor Club
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 15, 1932No. Gen. No. 35,684PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson
The plaintiff, George B. Scott, recovered a judgment against the defendant, The Inter-Insurance Exchange of the Chicago Motor Club, under a certain policy of insurance issued by the defendant to one Peter Hanrahan. The policy of insurance covering Hanrahan contained a clause to the effect that the insurance provided should also inure to the benefit of any person or persons while riding in or operating any of the automobiles owned by Hanrahan and described in the schedule, provided said person was operating said machine with the permission of the assured.
On the night of February 27,1929, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Haas Tobacco Co. v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Treolo v. Iroquois Auto Insurance UnderwritersIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Rochester Mining Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Ferry v. National Motor UnderwritersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Remsen v. Midway Liquors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- INA Insurance Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- National Surety Corporation v. L. E. Wells, Sr. v. R. Hopfe, and Ella Hopfe, and L. E. Wells, Jr., a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Western States Mutual Insurance v. Standard Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- Muthart v. BurikAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.