Legal Opinion

Laymon v. Braddock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1989No. 88-230PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

544 So.2d 900 (1989)

Cecil LAYMON and Linda J. Laymon

v.

Kenneth BRADDOCK, et al.

88-230.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 10, 1989.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1989.

Barry N. McCrary, Talladega, and Donald W. Stewart, Anniston, for appellants.

George A. Monk of Merrill, Porch, Doster & Dillon, Anniston, for appellees.

2Per curiam

This is an action brought by Cecil Laymon and Linda J. Laymon, individually, and as parents of Lesia Gayle Laymon, their deceased minor daughter, against Kenneth Braddock; James A. Carson, d/b/a Carson Spur Station; and Michele Jones,[1] for the wrongful death of Lesia.

Lesia was killed when…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kizziah v. Golden Rule Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Armstrong v. Life Ins. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  3. McClay v. WorrallNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Allred v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Cross v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parker v. Miller Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Espey v. Convenience MarketersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. ATTALLA GOLF & CTY. CLUB v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. McLeod v. Cannon Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Liao v. Harry's BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API