Legal Opinion
Polson v. Davis
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 25, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-2211PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.
The defendants in this action have filed a motion for summary judgment as to virtually all aspects of plaintiff’s second amended complaint. In this memorandum and order, we address each of the numerous legal grounds asserted in support of that motion.
Entry of summary judgment is appropriate where “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- V-1 Oil Company, a Wyoming Corporation v. State of Wyoming, Department of Environmental Quality Steven P. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Polson v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Scheideman v. Shawnee County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Flenker v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Frederick Lawrence White, Jr. Benjamin L. Staponski, Jr. v. General Motors Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.