Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 2, 2009No. 2071157Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Judge.

On December 31, 2001, Mark Armstrong purchased a 2002 Mazda Protégé automobile from Mitchell Motors, an authorized dealer of Mazda products. Armstrong paid $18,806.97 for the vehicle, which was covered by a “New Vehicle 36-month/50, 000 Mile Limited Warranty” that contained the following express warranty provision:

“Mazda [North American Operations] warrants that your new Mazda Vehicle is free from defects in material or workmanship, subject to the following terms and conditions. A Mazda Dealer will make necessary repairs, using new or remanufactured parts, to correct any problem…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Snelson v. KammIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gill v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Razor v. Hyundai Motor AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Burrus v. Itek Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Stinson v. Acme Propane Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API