Legal Opinion

Tillson v. Moulton

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

This was a bill in chancery by appellant against appellee and others, to foreclose a mortgage. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Breese. The cause was tried in the Adams Circuit Court, Sibley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBreese, J.

The questions presented by this record are, had John Tillson, Sen., such an interest in the S. E. 36, 1 S., 9 W., as warranted the mortgage to complainant, and has complainant in equity a lien upon such interest ? And next, how should the account be stated between John Tillson, Sen., and the defendant, Moulton ?

The defendant insists that the legal title to this land was vested in John Tillson, Jr., who had no beneficial interest in it, but held it together with lots four and seven, being part of the north-east quarter of the north-west quarter of section four, in town thirty-nine north,range…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. FayNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  2. Lane v. ShearsNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sutphen v. CushmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Hancock v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ruckman v. AlwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Shaver v. WoodwardIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  5. German Insurance v. Gibe ex rel. MinnichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API