United States v. Charles Ronald McElroy
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
The National Stolen Property Act prohibits the transportation in interstate commerce of forged checks. In this appeal, the defendant argues that the prosecution had to prove that the checks were altered before they were taken over a state line. We conclude that if an unauthorized signature is placed on a check at any point during interstate movement, either before or after a state border is crossed, the statute has been violated. We find sufficient evidence to support the convictions on two counts charging such offenses. We do not, however, find…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Scarborough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The United States v. Shirl F. Kapp, Ronald Klinger, Robert Lewis, Robert Miller and Paul Briggs. Appeal of Paul BriggsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- McElroy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Lawrence W. Wright Lawrence WrightCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Ghouth v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Richard M. McQuestion v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc., Louis A. Hart v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.