Legal Opinion

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. HVFG LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 12, 2013No. C 12-05809 WHAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this false-advertising action, plaintiffs assert that defendants’ advertisements misrepresent the nature of defendants’ páté. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion to dismiss is Granted in part and Denied in part.

STATEMENT

Plaintiffs Animal Legal Defense Fund, a California nonprofit'corporation, and Regal Vegan, a New York corporation, allege that defendants Hudson Valley Foie Gras, LLC, a New York corporation, and four of its officers (collectively “Hudson Valley”)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Warren v. Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Dana v. Hershey Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. 7EDU Impact Academy Inc. v. YouDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Silver v. BA Sports Nutrition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API