Bryan v. Willingham-Little Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The suit was brought on the theory that none of the mineral interests passed under the several devises, and the title to these therefore is held in equal proportion by the heirs of the testator. It affirmatively appears from the petition that all the parties plaintiff, either in person or through the ancestor in whose right they claim, had conveyed, before the filing of this suit, all their rights to the mineral interests in various parcels of the entire tract. In doing so they received in each instance a money consideration. It is true that the description in their deeds named…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Eller v. McMillanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. SearsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Poore v. PooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Imerys Marble Co. v. J.M. Huber Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Supreme Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Cohen v. GlassSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.