Dimick v. Linnell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiff, while a pedestrian upon a highway, was hit by defendant’s automobile. Prom a judgment for *510plaintiff for damages defendant appealed. The only issue is whether defendant’s motion for directed verdict should have been granted on the basis that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
At about two o’clock on a foggy morning plaintiff decided to try to find a place where he could purchase some cigarettes. He left his home and walked to the Pacific Highway at a point about a mile from the city of Roseburg. At the highway he turned south and walked along its east…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lemons v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Stachniewicz v. Mar-Cam CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Whitt v. DynanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Ramos Oppenheimer v. Leduc MaldonadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.