Legal Opinion

Clendenning v. Perrine

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cuming county. Heard below before Kinkaid,. J. Hurley v. Estes, 6 Neb., 386; Flagg v. Mann, 2 Sumner [U. S.], 533; Page v. Foster, 7 N. EL, 394. Littlejohn v. Turner, 40 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 621; McEindley v. Nourse, 40 N. W. Rep. [Ia.], 750; Conlee Lumber Co. v. Meyer, 38 Id., 117; Wilson v. Moore, 13 Neb., 240.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

On the 26th day of June, 1882, William T. Clendenning, of Wisner, assigned all his property to the appellee, Henry Perrine, for the benefit of all his creditors. The assignee gave bond, took possession of the property, and converted the same into money. The assignee gave due and legal notice of his appointment as assignee on July 22, 1882, and the creditors of the assignor were notified to file their claims with the assignee within six months from said date. Numerous claims were filed with the assignee within the statutory time, some of which were paid in full, some fifty per cent of their…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Marshall-Wells Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Commercial National Bank v. LippNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API