Legal Opinion

Commercial National Bank v. Lipp

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1896No. 5771Published

Error from the district court of Pawnee county. Tried below before Bush, J. The Opinion contains a statement of the case. Plaintiff in error should be permitted, to. present its claim for allowance and to share in the distribution of the assigned estate, though the claim was not filed within the time fixed by the county court. (Powers v. Hill, 27 Mo.

Read the full summary

Error from the district court of Pawnee county. Tried below before Bush, J. The Opinion contains a statement of the case. Plaintiff in error should be permitted, to. present its claim for allowance and to share in the distribution of the assigned estate, though the claim was not filed within the time fixed by the county court. (Powers v. Hill, 27 Mo. App., 190 ; Elwood v. Marsh, 31 Neb., 134; Clendenning v. Perrine, 32 Neb., 159; Owens v. Ramsdell, 33 O. St., 439; Carpenter v. Diclc, 41 O. St., 297; Fourth Nat. Bank v. Scudder,, 15 Mo. App., 463; Myers v. Board of Education, 32 Pac. Rep.…

1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.

From July 1, 1889, until December 21, following, one E. F. Hempstead was engaged in the business of banking at Pawnee City, in this state, under the name and style of the Nebraska State Bank of Pawnee City. He was also engaged in furnishing electric lights under the name and style of the Pawnee City Electric Light Company. On the day last mentioned said Hempstead made.an assignment for the benefit of all his creditors to A. D. Strunk, sheriff of said county. The inventory of assets executed December 30 includes the banking house and all credits of the bank; also the premises upon which was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clendenning v. PerrineNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Commercial National Bank v. Nebraska State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API