Luhrs v. Sturtevant
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Wasco Comity.
1Opinion of the Court
By tbe Court,
Lord, C. JA
This is a suit in equity to enjoin an obstruction of an alleged public highway. Substantially, the complainant alleges for himself and on behalf of all other persons similarly interested, that he owns and resides on a farm on the east side of the east fork of Birch creek, in Umatilla county; that the school house of the district and the store at which he has been accustomed to trade, are situated on the west side of said creek, and in or near a village known as Mount Pleasant; that a public highway extends through said village in an east and west direction; that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mohawk Bridge Co. v. Utica & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Pettibone v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Green v. OakesIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
- Williams v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Walker v. ShepardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fleischner v. Citizens' Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
- Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Lowell v. Pendleton Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Bernard v. Willamette Box & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Esson v. WattierOregon Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.