Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Wolfe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1989No. Nos. 96 and 139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This case presents a question not previously addressed in our appellate case law. The issue is: Where an attorney for an injured employee who has been paid worker’s compensation benefits negotiates a structured settlement on behalf of the injured employee in the employee’s action against a third party tortfeasor, and the initial payment under the settlement is not sufficient to pay both the attorney’s fee and the subrogation claim of the employer’s compensation carrier under Section 319 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Pa.Stat.Ann. tit. 77, § 671 (Purdon 1989), is the attorney…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dale Manufacturing Co. v. BressiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Winfree v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Helms Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Kefover v. Potter Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Allegheny Beverage Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Allegheny Beverage Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API