Legal Opinion

Brueggeman v. Continental Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 20, 1987No. 86-0333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEich, J.

Mary Brueggeman appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her complaint against Riverview Boat Lines and its insurer, Continental Casualty Company. She was injured when she fell while walking on a path on property owned by Riverview when a tree root gave way under her feet. The trial court held that the hazard causing the injury was "open and obvious, and ... of purely natural origin,” and absolved Riverview of all liability. We agree with that determination and affirm.

In summary judgment cases, we employ the same analysis as the trial court. We need not repeat that oft-used procedure here.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  2. Delmore v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Baker v. McDel Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Treps v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Baker v. Janesville Traction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Antwaun A. Ex Rel. Muwonge v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Griebler v. Doughboy Recreational, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Antwaun A. Ex Rel. Muwonge v. Heritage Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Griebler v. Doughboy Recreational, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API