Glover v. United States
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.
This Memorandum Opinion disposes of Defendant United States of America’s Partial Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 9, and accompanying Memorandum, ECF No. 9-1; Plaintiffs’ Opposition, ECF No. 11, and accompanying Memorandum, ECF No. 11-1; and Defendant’s Reply, ECF No. 19. A hearing is not necessary. See Loe. R. 105.6. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss shall be DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
For purposes of considering Defendant’s Motion, this Court accepts the facts that Plaintiffs alleged in the Complaint as true. See Aziz v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Anna Mae R. Henderson v. United States of America, Anne Marie Henderson, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Anna Marie R. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Kornegay v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Turner v. DixonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025