Legal Opinion

Andrzejczyk v. Advo System, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 26, 1959PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment enjoining it from erecting a fence which prevents the plaintiffs from using a driveway which is in part on the defendant’s land and in part on land of the plaintiffs and extends from the street to the rear of their premises.

The defendant seeks extensive corrections in the finding, but none are warranted which could alter the trial court’s conclusions. A summary of the facts follows: On May 25, 1956, the plaintiffs acquired title to a parcel of land on the west side of John Street in Hartford known as Nos. 9-11. It has a frontage of 48 feet on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Klein v. DeRosaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  4. Deregibus v. Silberman Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Phillips v. BonadiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Cheever v. GravesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Putnam, Coffin & Burr, Inc. v. HalpernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  5. Klar Crest Realty, Inc. v. Rajon Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API