Lumpkin v. Murrell
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. M. H. Bonner. This case can be understood from the opinion. The nature of the controversy does not admit of an abstract of the pleadings, exhibits, evidence, orders, &c., contained in the record of about four hundred pages. The case went to the jury on twenty-six special issues.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. M. H. Bonner. This case can be understood from the opinion. The nature of the controversy does not admit of an abstract of the pleadings, exhibits, evidence, orders, &c., contained in the record of about four hundred pages. The case went to the jury on twenty-six special issues. They and the assignment of errors sufficiently, appear in the opinion; except that the second of the assignments by appellee, pointed out that in the account the whole of expenses of repairing a storehouse had been charged to the share of plaintiffs instead of to the…
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Associate Justice.
This suit was brought by appellees to recover from the appellant Lumpkin, the executor of John Murchison, deceased, her father, the share or interest which she claimed as an heir of her deceased mother, Pauline H. Murchison, in the community estate of her said father and mother, as well as her part of her mother’s separate estate, which had come into his hands as such executor, and to recover for use, occupation, and enjoyment of said property, together with interest thereon, and all profits derived, or which by reasonable diligence might have been derived, therefrom…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Carter v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Sanger Bros. v. Heirs of MoodyTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Pressley's Heirs v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Pierce v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 1916
- Wenar v. StenzelTexas Supreme Court · 1878
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.