Legal Opinion

Capital Mortgage Holding v. Hahn

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1985No. 15188PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Capital Mortgage Holding Corporation (“Capital”) brought suit in district court against the respondents seeking specific performance or damages for breach of an oral contract. Respondents moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for relief pursuant to NRCP 12(b)(5), on the ground that recovery was barred by the statute of frauds. The district court granted the motion, and this appeal followed. For the reasons expressed below, we reverse.

On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief, the trial court and this court must construe the pleadings…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merluzzi v. LarsonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Summa Corp. v. GreenspunNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Zunino v. ParamoreNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Schreiber v. SchreiberNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Brown v. KellarNevada Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bergmann v. BoyceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Borger v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Breliant v. Preferred Equities Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Blanchard v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API