Legal Opinion

Borger v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2004No. 42128PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Maupin, J.:

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges district court orders dismissing petitioner’s medical malpractice action and denying his motion to amend his malpractice complaint. Because the petition involves important issues of law concerning the expert witness certification requirements of recently enacted NRS 41A.071, issues that merit clarification to further judicial economy in this case and in general, we grant this petition for writ relief.1

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In January 1998, petitioner Alan Borger consulted with real party in interest…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ashokan v. State, Department of InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Business Computer Rentals v. State TreasurerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Goldberg v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. ConneryNevada Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Weddell v. H2O, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Washoe Medical Center v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Szydel v. MarkmanNevada Supreme Court · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API