Legal Opinion

Town of West Rutland v. Rutland Railway Light & Power Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 2, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

This is a petition for mandamus to compel the petitionee to forthwith repair and surface that portion of the highway between its tracks and for a distance of two feet on each side thereof, on certain streets in the village of West Rut-land, all in said town, with a concrete pavement seven inches in thickness; the concrete to be a mixture in strength of one part cement, two parts sand and four parts crushed stone; or by a paved road of equal strength, hardness, imperviability to moisture, and surface,- and for other relief. The respondent alleges in effect:(1) That the petitioner has a full…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  5. Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  2. Barber v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. Matter of Mae Disorda SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. City of Burlington v. Burlington Traction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  5. Crystal Brook Farm, Inc. v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API