Town of West Rutland v. Rutland Railway Light & Power Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.
This is a petition for mandamus to compel the petitionee to forthwith repair and surface that portion of the highway between its tracks and for a distance of two feet on each side thereof, on certain streets in the village of West Rut-land, all in said town, with a concrete pavement seven inches in thickness; the concrete to be a mixture in strength of one part cement, two parts sand and four parts crushed stone; or by a paved road of equal strength, hardness, imperviability to moisture, and surface,- and for other relief. The respondent alleges in effect:(1) That the petitioner has a full…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- McAllister v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Goodwin, Admx. v. GastonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Barber v. ChaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Matter of Mae Disorda SavageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- City of Burlington v. Burlington Traction Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Crystal Brook Farm, Inc. v. Control CommissionersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.