Legal Opinion
Hidalgo v. RIBBLE CONTRACTING
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 2008No. 30,473PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} In this appeal, arising under the Workers’ Compensation Administration Act (WCAA), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-5-1 to -22 (1986, as amended), we review the timeliness of a party’s petition seeking modification of a binding recommended resolution that is internally inconsistent due to a clerical error. Having reviewed the relevant statutory provisions, we conclude that a party may petition a workers’ compensation judge to modify a binding recommended resolution within the two-year time period provided by statute, so long as the party’s application is based on one of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- Armijo v. Save 'N GainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Fasso v. SIERRA HEALTHCARE CENTERNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Norman v. Lockheed Engineering & Science Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hernandez v. Grando's LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- Laughlin v. Convenient Management Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
- Laughlin v. Convenient Mgmt. Servs., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Laughlin v. Convenient Management Services, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rodriguez v. Advantage AlarmNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.