Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Street Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 17, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

By ordinance No. 266 the town council of the city of Dardanelle, Arkansas, on September 29, 1925, created Street Improvement District No. 1 in the town of Dardanelle for the purpose of paving certain streets. On the 29th of October, 1925, the council repealed ordinance No. 266 and passed ordinance No. 270, creating an improvement district in the town of Dardanelle designated as Street Improvement District No. 1. This'district was created for the purpose of paving certain streets in. the town of Dardanelle. On November 6, 1925, a petition was presented to the council, purporting to contain a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cranford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. City of Malvern v. NunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Improvement District No. 1 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Riddle v. BallewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. Henry v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curb & Gutter Dist. No. 37 of Fayetteville v. ParrishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. High v. Bailey, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Simmons v. FessendenSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. American State Bank, Charleston v. Street Imp. Dist. No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Bellott v. WeatherlySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API