Legal Opinion

In Re Crusinberry's Estate

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1964No. 35582PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

This action was commenced by the filing of a Haim against the estate of Park M. Crusinberry, deceased. Eva A. Crusinberry, the claimant and appellee, is the widow of the deceased. Verla Merryman, the appellant, is a daughter of the deceased and the executrix named in his will.

The claimant alleged that the deceased was indebted to her in the amount of $1,600.40 on March 1, 1958; that on October 20, 1958, she credited the deceased with the sum of $240.90; that on September 10, 1959, she loaned the deceased the sum of $138; and that the balance due her from the deceased was $1,497.50. The answer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hancock v. ParksNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Aye v. GartnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kiser v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Bratt v. WishartNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Maca v. SabataNebraska Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carley v. MeinkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Fritchley v. Love-Courson Drilling Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Metropolitan Technical Community College Area v. South Omaha Industrial Park Development Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Boardman v. McNeffNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Metropolitan Technical Community College Area v. South Omaha Industrial Park Development Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API