Legal Opinion

Skydive Arizona, Inc. v. Quattrochi

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 31, 2010No. CV-05-2656-PHX-MHMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARY H. MURGUIA, District Judge.

Currently before the Court are Plaintiff Skydive Arizona’s (“Skydive”) Motion for Attorney Fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117, (Dkt. #371), and Motion for an Award of Increased Damages and Profits. (Dkt. # 396). Also before the Court are Defendants Cary Quattrochi, Ben Butler, USSO, LLC d/b/a 1800SKYRIDE (“USSO”), Atlanta SC, Inc. (“Atlanta SC”), CASC, Inc. (“CASC”), IGOVincent, Inc.’s (“IGOVincent”) Motion to Reduce Jury Verdict, (Dkt. #376), and Motion for Judgement not Withstanding the Verdict, Accounting, Remittitur, or in the Alternative, a New Trial.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Simmons v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API