People v. Hines
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his request to impose sanctions on the People at trial for failing to preserve a 911 tape. Although the court erred in ruling that the tape does not constitute Rosario material (see, CPL 240.45 [1] [a]), sanctions were not required because the tape was destroyed pursuant to routine police procedure before defendant requested it (see, People v Diggs, 185 AD2d 990; cf., People v Parker, 157 AD2d 519, lv denied 76 NY2d 793). Moreover, defendant was not prejudiced by the destruction…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. D'AlessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. ComerNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. DiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. RussilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001