Legal Opinion

People v. Comer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1989PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant maintains that he is entitled to a new trial because of improper comments by the District Attorney during summation or, failing that, that the matter must be remitted to the Appellate Division so that it may exercise its factual review powers and determine whether the jury’s verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490).

Defendant failed to preserve his claims of error on many of the District Attorney’s comments during summation and the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. D'AlessandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. BlacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. OliphantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API