Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce Eugene De Betham

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1973No. 72-2732PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

After waiver of a jury trial, appellant was convicted by the court of violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844 [possession of heroin]. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and sentence. We affirm.

ISSUE

The sole issue before us is whether the trial judge committed error in failing to receive beneficial polygraphic 1 evidence offered by appellant.

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION

In support of his contention, appellant directs our attention to volume after volume of testimony, produced at the preliminary hearing, pointing to the reliability of this type evidence. During the four day hearing, the appellant called…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. Seyed Mohammed SadrzadehCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Arnulfo Salazar-GaetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry BrulayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Steven John AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API