Legal Opinion

Sarner v. Mason

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 21, 1955No. 11638PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

The individual plaintiffs own all the common stock of the thirteen corporate plaintiffs. The corporate plaintiffs, corporations of New Jersey, constructed and operate housing projects financed through Federal Housing Administration insured loans. Pursuant to the statute and the regulations1 the Commissioner of the FHA is the holder of all of the preferred stock of each of the corpora*178tions. Under the certificates of incorporation, which are substantially identical, the Commissioner, the sole preferred stockholder, has the right to replace the boards of directors of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. De Busk v. HarvinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
  3. Korman v. Federal Housing AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Jones v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1950
  5. Sarner v. MasonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jehan Zeb Mir v. Richard G. Fosburg, Perry Ah-Tye, and Horrace WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. State of New Jersey v. MoriarityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
  3. In Re Green River Drainage AreaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1956
  4. Goldfarb v. MullerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  5. Lindy v. LynnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API