Legal Opinion

Sarner v. Mason

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1955No. Civ. 732-54PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEANEY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Sidney Sarner, Leonard Sarner and Maurice Sarner, are the owners and holders of all of the common stock of the 13 plaintiff corporations identified as Linwood Park, Inc., Sections 1 to 13 inclusive. The Commissioner of the Federal Housing Administration in accordance with the provisions of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 1738 and 1743, and the regulations promulgated under that act, purchased 100 shares of preferred stock at $1.00 per share in each of the 13 plaintiff corporations. Under the act and the regulations issued in conformity thereto…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Harvey v. American Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. Langdon v. Hillside Coal & Iron Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1890
  4. Lee Line Steamers v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. F. W. Eversley & Co. v. East New York Non-Profit HDFC, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  2. James River Apartments, Inc. v. Federal Housing AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  3. Lance International, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Garden Homes, Inc. v. Norman P. Mason, as He is Commissioner of Federal Housing AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956
  5. Harlem River Produce Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API