Legal Opinion

Olson v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided January 25, 2006No. 2:04-cv-00102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1 TO EXCLUDE OTHER INCIDENTS WITHOUT A PRIOR SHOWING OF SUBSTANTIAL SIMILARITY

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is the “Defendant’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Other Incidents Without a Prior Showing of Substantial Similarity,” filed on January 9, 2006. The Plaintiff filed a response opposing the motion on January 18, 2006. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted, in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The defendant, Ford Motor Company (Ford), requests an order prohibiting at trial the introduction of evidence, testimony,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. v. ArmstrongTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Evelyn and Jack Lewy v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  4. Lovett v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. Erik Thomas Peterson, by His Next Friend Victor Peterson, Victor Peterson and Geneva Peterson v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hetzer-Young v. Elano Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. In Re OsterwalderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API