Legal Opinion

Stott v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 2002No. CA CR 01-1178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

The appellant in this criminal case was convicted of DWI, fourth offense, and of driving on a suspended license. He was sentenced to twenty-four months in the Arkansas Department of Community Punishment. This appeal followed.

For reversal, appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of driving while intoxicated, and that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of the breathalyzer test result. We affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we review the sufficiency of the evidence prior to the consideration of trial errors.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. McFerrin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  4. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API