Legal Opinion

Boston & Providence Railroad v. Old Colony Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 26, 1929PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugo, C.J.

These parties, pursuant to G. L. c. 251, submitted controversies specified in a statement of demands to the determination of arbitrators, whose award was to be final subject to this provision: “In making their award the arbitrators shall apply the principles of statutory and common law which in their opinion are legally applicable to the lease and any question of law may in their discretion, or, upon request of all parties, shall be reported by the arbitrators for determination by the court to which their award is to be reported subject to appeal.” The award of the arbitrators states that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. McCoach v. Minehill & Schuylkill Haven RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Cheney Bros. Co. v. Commonwealth of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. United States v. Warren R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. Gale Shoe Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Eno Systems, Inc. v. EnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API