Legal Opinion

People v. Tux Winery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1937No. Civ. 11351PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment after an order sustaining a general demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend. In the complaint the plaintiff sued the defendant for certain excise taxes alleged to have been due on sales of distilled spirits, made by wholesalers to wholesalers, but not to retailers.

The sole question necessa^ for the determination of the appeal is this: Is the excise tax on distilled spirits under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1123) collectible on sales of distilled spirits at a time prior to a sale to a retailer? If the tax is collectible…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rathjen Bros. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Gooderham & Worts, Ltd. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Sauers Wholesale Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. HendricksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API