Legal Opinion
In Re of the United States for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Information
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 27, 2010No. 2:10-cv-00550PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The United States seeks an order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)-(d) (the “Stored Communications Act” or “SCA”), directing Sprint Nextel to disclose, with respect to all calls and text messages to and from a certain mobile telephone over a period of 58 days, all “recorded information identifying the base station towers and sectors that received transmissions from” that telephone. Docket Entry (“DE”) 1 at l. 1 The government has proffered “specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable grounds to believe that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- In re United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- United States v. GrahamDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- In Re of the United States for Historical Cell Site DataDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.