Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Colorado County. Tried below before Hon. M. Kennon.

1Opinion of the Court

McMeans, Associate Justice.

The following statement of the nature and result of the suit made by appellant in his brief is substantially correct and is adopted:

“Suit by W. J. Wirtz, appellant, against the Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company, appellee, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence at night on the morning of the 10th day of July, 1906, while engaged in his duties as a switchman for defendant in its yard at Glidden, Briefly stated, plaintiff alleges that there were a great many switch tracks run ning east and west in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. G., C. & Santa Fe R'y Co. v. EvansichTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. BingleTexas Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. ContoisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Greene Gold-Silver Co. v. SilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Blackley v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
  4. Magnolia Paper Co. v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Walgreen Texas Co. v. ShiversCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API