Tuck v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.
This case presents the question whether a defendant, in establishing indigency for purposes of procuring a free appellate record, must prove the reasonableness of his expenses and financial obligations in order to obtain a free record for appeal. We conclude, as did the court of appeals in this case, that an inquiry into the reasonableness of a defendant’s expenses and financial obligations is relevant in determining whether a defendant is indigent and unable to pay or give security for the appellate record. Nevertheless, we vacate the court of appeals’ decision and remand to the trial…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Snoke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Easily v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
- Alfredo Paez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2024
- Alyssa Gayle Litwin v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2022
- Christopher Lamont Taylor v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
- Christopher Lamont Taylor v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.