Legal Opinion

Tuck v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 2007No. PD-0220-06PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · PricePrice, J.

This case presents the question whether a defendant, in establishing indigency for purposes of procuring a free appellate record, must prove the reasonableness of his expenses and financial obligations in order to obtain a free record for appeal. We conclude, as did the court of appeals in this case, that an inquiry into the reasonableness of a defendant’s expenses and financial obligations is relevant in determining whether a defendant is indigent and unable to pay or give security for the appellate record. Nevertheless, we vacate the court of appeals’ decision and remand to the trial…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Snoke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Castillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Easily v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  2. Alfredo Paez, Jr. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2024
  3. Alyssa Gayle Litwin v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2022
  4. Christopher Lamont Taylor v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  5. Christopher Lamont Taylor v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API