Legal Opinion

State v. Norris

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 11, 1905PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court.— HoN. B. H. Miller, Judge. The defendant was convicted of the crime of rape, and appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SheewiN, O. J.

The defendant has been twice convicted of raping his own daughter, a girl under the age of consent, and this is the second appeal to this court. See State v. Norris, 122 Iowa, 154. At the close of the State’s case the defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that there was no evidence corroborating the prosecutrix which tended to connect him with the commission of the crime charged, and whether there was or not is the principal question for determination on this appeal.

1. Rape: corroboration; evidence. The requirement of the statute (Code, section 5488), is met if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. State v. ComstockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CrouchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. State v. O'MearaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. State v. RalstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. State v. LahmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API