Legal Opinion
Argus Chemical Corporation v. Fibre Glass-Evercoat Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 4, 1985No. Appeal 84-1418PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a patent infringement suit tried in a bench trial before the district court of the Central District of California. Because we hold that the patents in suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 3,181,991 and 3,182,026, were procured by inequitable conduct, we reverse the judgment of the district court holding appellant liable for infringement.
I
Argus Chemical Corporation is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 3,181,991 (the “Pigmentation Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 3,182,-026 for homogeneous pigmented peroxide .compositions (the “Homogeneous Patent”). The.respective filing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Driscoll v. CebaloCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Application of Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- In re ClarkCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Digital Control v. The Charles MacHine Works (Also Known as Ditchwitch)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Halliburton Company v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Umc Electronics Company v. The United States, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.