Legal Opinion

Halter v. Department of Revenue of the State, Motor Vehicle Division

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1993No. 91CA2058PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge METZGER.

Plaintiff, Peter Halter, appeals from the district court judgment affirming the revocation of his driver’s license by the Department of Revenue for refusing to submit to testing as required by the express consent law. We affirm.

The record reveals the following facts. On November 24, 1990, at approximately 11:48 p.m., plaintiff was stopped for speeding, and a “DUI officer” was subsequently called to the scene. Upon his arrival, the DUI officer noted an odor of an alcoholic beverage on plaintiff’s breath and that his eyes were red and watery. Accordingly, he requested…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Dolan v. RustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Colorado Department of Revenue v. KirkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. Alford v. TiptonColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Baker v. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE, MVDColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gallion v. Colorado Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  2. Poe v. Department of Revenue of the State, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Meyer v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Long v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Gallion v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API