Legal Opinion

Woodhams v. Jennings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1905No. 20,452PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Warren Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Judge. Petition for the establishment of a turnpike by Alfred G. Woodhams and others against which George II. Jennings and others remonstrate. From a judgment for remonstrants, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This proceeding was commenced by appellants under §§6792-6812 Burns 1901, Acts 1889, p. 433, for the construction of a free turnpike on a public highway located on the line dividing the counties of Warren and Benton. A remonstrance was filed by appellees. Appellants filed a motion to strike out the third and fourth causes of remonstrance, which was overruled by the boards of commissioners of said counties in joint session, and, after hearing the evidence, appellants’ petition was dismissed by said boards. Appellants appealed to the court below, where they renewed their motion to strike out…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. GaumerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. City of Crawfordsville v. BrundageIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Holland v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Pfau v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Petree v. BrothertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Trust Co. v. WernkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hart v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ft. Wayne & Southwestern Traction Co. v. Ft. Wayne & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Guenther v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API