Legal Opinion
Munoz v. InGenesis STGI Partners, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 22, 2016No. Case No.: 14cv1547-MMA (BLM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Hon. Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Vanessa Munoz alleges Defendants InGenesis, Inc. (“InGenesis”), In-Genesis STGi Partners, LLC (the Joint Venture or “JV”) and STG International, Inc. (“STGi”) unlawfully: (1) required her to use Paid Time Off.while on military leave (Count I); (2) terminated her- be*1100cause she took military leave (Count II); and (3) failed to reemploy her after she returned from military leave (Counts III and IV). Defendants move for summary judgment as to all of Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartman v. Canyon CountyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Mustafa v. Yuma Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023