Legal Opinion
Whitaker v. Peet's Coffee, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 11, 2022No. 3:21-cv-07698Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 21-cv-07698-VC Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION FOR v. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS PEET'S COFFEE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 51 Defendant. The motion for attorney’s fees and sanctions is granted in part and denied in part. I. Brian Whitaker alleges that he visited Peet’s Coffee in the SoMa neighborhood of San Francisco in September 2021 “to avail himself of its goods or services motivated in part to determine if the defendants comply with the disability access laws.” Complaint ¶ 8, Dkt. No. 1. Whitaker is quadriplegic and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.