Legal Opinion

Hollar v. Cain

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 11, 2002No. 00-5737Published

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity medical malpractice action, the plaintiff-appellant Stanley Hollar (“Hollar”) has contested the trial court’s final judgment in favor of all defendants. On review, he has charged that the district judge improperly directed a verdict for certain defendants, and that alleged trial errors tainted the jury verdict in favor of the remaining defendants. He has requested a new trial against all defendants.

On the evening of Wednesday, January 31, 1996, Hollar, then a twenty-year-old student at Kentucky Christian College, was playing “goalie” in an indoor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API