Hollar v. Cain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity medical malpractice action, the plaintiff-appellant Stanley Hollar (“Hollar”) has contested the trial court’s final judgment in favor of all defendants. On review, he has charged that the district judge improperly directed a verdict for certain defendants, and that alleged trial errors tainted the jury verdict in favor of the remaining defendants. He has requested a new trial against all defendants.
On the evening of Wednesday, January 31, 1996, Hollar, then a twenty-year-old student at Kentucky Christian College, was playing “goalie” in an indoor…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.