Legal Opinion

United States v. Marino

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 1944No. 301PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge.

When agents of the Alcohol Tax Unit on December 26, 1942, observed defendant Marino taking a carton from the back seat of an automobile in which both defendants had been riding, they proceeded to investigate and found that in the carton was an unstamped can containing about 3% gallons of ethyl alcohol, 89.37% by volume, fit for beverage purposes, i.e., pure bootleg alcohol. In view of the basic proof thus presented of possession and transportation of desirable beverage alcohol unstamped, it is not surprising that the jury found defendants guilty of violation of 26 U.S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Scher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Willie Lee Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. MichelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. United States v. WodiskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Tony Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. McDonald v. Jarka Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API